|

From Parenting New Mexico October1999
ARTICLE TWO OF FOUR ARTICLES ON
LEARNING DISABILITIES
Diagnosing
Learning Disabilities:
Untangling the Mystery
by Gayle L. Zieman, Ph.D.
In last month's article describing Learning Disabilities (LD)
we discussed the complexity and many forms of LD. It is the complex
nature and many types which make the diagnosis a multi-dimensional
task requiring the assessment of many abilities. A full LD evaluation
is a complicated array of diagnostic tests designed to systematically
determine whether an individual is having difficulty in one or
more of the many skills which go into readin', 'ritin', and 'rithmatic.
LD evaluations are usually completed
by educational diagnosticians in the public schools or by psychologists
with special training in educational/school psychology or neuropsychology.
Helpful ancillary testing is often obtained from speech and language
pathologists and occupational therapists.
In this article we describe the many
skill areas which must be assessed. In next month's article we
will build on these to discuss Dyslexia (reading disorders) and
Disorders of Written Expression.
Intellectual Functioning.
To determine that someone has a disability
in one of the areas labeled LD relates to their general intellectual
functioning. Being one grade level behind in math, for example,
may be a marked disability for a very gifted child, while being
two grade levels behind may be somewhat expected for a student
whose overall functioning is well below average.
For this reason, an LD evaluation begins
with an assessment of the individual's IQ. In school-based evaluations,
an individual intelligence test taking about 90 minutes is the
starting place of an assessment. The most common IQ test involves
a series of subtests assessing different skills which are grouped
into Verbal Subtests (those which require language for the child's
response) and Performance Subtests (those not involving language).
Other uses of the IQ test in school evaluations is discussed
later in the article. In private evaluations short forms of the
IQ test are often used when the IQ is assumed to be average,
or there is previous testing.
Based on the IQ estimate, the evaluator
has a baseline for comparing other skills, such as reading and
mathematical abilities. The IQ estimate provides an estimate
of what to expect from the child. Major deviations above this
are labeled talents while major deviations below are called disabilities.
Academic Achievement.
For comparison to the expected levels
based on the IQ estimate, the child's basic academic skills are
assessed. Important academic skills evaluated are: word decoding
(ability to read individual words), reading fluency (reading
sentences and paragraphs), reading comprehension (knowing the
content of what has been read), written expression (spelling
and the ability to write paragraphs/stories), and knowledge and
application of mathematics.
In my evaluations I measure spelling
and mathematical skills both in mental functioning (spotting
correctly spelled words and understanding math concepts) and
with on-paper production (writing spelling words and doing math
problems). I am often amazed at the
difference between in-the-head abilities and what is produced
on paper.
Language Abilities.
Assessing language skills is critical
in an LD evaluation. The evaluator must establish the child's
skill levels in: spoken language, receptive vocabulary (words
recognized when others use them), expressive vocabulary (words
he/she can actively use), fluency, and syntax (grammar). When
there are strong concerns about a child's functioning in these
areas, a separate evaluation by a speech and language pathologist
is warranted.
When the basics of speech are intact, the assessment moves to
phonological processing - the ability to manipulate sounds
(phonemes) and letter combinations representing sounds to make
words (phonics). When a child is struggling with phonological
processing, reading and spelling will be impaired, and remediation
of these skills is needed. We will discuss phonological processing
more in next month's article on Dyslexia.
Specific Information Processing Skills.
There are a number of mental data processing
abilities other than language which are needed to perform school
tasks. Most prominent to assess are fine motor abilities, visual-spatial
skills, and memory proficiency.
Fine motor skills as related to learning
disabilities involve being able to hold a pencil correctly, draw
easily within small spaces like the lines on a piece of notebook
paper, and, for older children, being able to learn typing and
the use of a keyboard. When there are distinct weaknesses, an
evaluation of coordination skills may be needed from an occupational
therapist.
Visual-spatial skills involve visual
perception (for example, being able to see that an N is made
from two vertical lines and a diagonal while knowing that H is
similar but not the same) and visual-motor integration (being
able to see an N and then draw it). Major impairments here create
havoc in perceiving letters correctly and
writing words. Mild impairments (often seen with older children
and adults) produce slowness in reading. Problems here also create
trouble in doing mathematics; like the boy doing a long division
problem who remarked, "I can't ever keep the columns of
numbers straight. Does that matter?"
Memory problems come in about as many
variations as there are ice cream flavors at Baskin Robbins.
Especially important to evaluate in LD testing are forms of sequential
memory, memory for the order of things. Remembering order requires
neurological processes different from remembering what just happened.
Many LD individuals have problems with these processes, especially
auditory sequential memory (remembering step wise directions
that the teacher gave, for example, or when using phonics remembering
the sounds so you can put them all together to say the word)
and visual sequential memory (being able to visualize a word
in your mind when trying to spell it). So often when I start
these testing procedures the kids blurt out, "Oh no, this
is going to be hard!" And I know that I have a kid who has
trouble following directions and remembering that "picnic"
ends with a c not a ck.
Public School Evaluations.
Whether your child is assessed by the
public schools or privately, all evaluators are looking to determine
talents, average abilities, and disabilities. However, the schools
have an extra burden - how to evaluate hundreds of children
in many schools by different evaluators and keep the process
impartial and consistent. In an attempt to maintain fairness
and consistency, the New Mexico Department of Education, like
most other states, has a very numerically-based definition of
what is a learning disability and what isn't. In New Mexico a
child's test score in one or more areas of academic achievement
must be a certain number of points or more (the amount varies
with grade level) lower than his/her IQ score (where both tests
have 50th percentile score set at 100). Meeting this standard
for a discrepancy between IQ and achievement qualifies a child
for receiving special education services while scores differing
by a smaller amount may certainly mark a significant problem
but will not qualify a child for the official school label of
LD or for special services. While most experts in LD disagree
with the use of this "discrepancy formula," alternative
LD definitions which can be used by schools have been difficult
to craft.
In non-school evaluations we can investigate
the full continuum of strengths and weaknesses including mild
problems and weak skills which may be producing subtle effects
on learning and performance. However, school-based evaluations
will remain how most children are assessed, and the basic test
battery designed by the schools, having a full IQ test compared
to an achievement test, continues to be necessary for an LD child
to be designated eligible for special education.
Since school-based evaluations are by
far the most prevalent, I provide an outline of the process in
the graphic (far right). The process begins with a referral from
a parent, teacher, or other knowledgeable individual asking the
school to provide extra assistance. First the School Support
Team (consisting of regular classroom teachers and special education
staff) reviews the options for providing help to the child. If
an evaluation for special
education services is warranted, a battery of tests, including
the IQ and achievement tests, is given by an educational diagnostician.
Finally, the diagnostician's findings and recommendations are
reviewed by the Individual Educational Plan (IEP) Committee consisting
of parents, teachers, school administrators, and special education
staff. In the meeting a formal document is drawn up outlining
the program to be provided - called the Individual Educational
Plan (IEP). The IEP and all processes within special education
are defined by federal law (the Individuals with Disabilities
Education Act - IDEA) and state Department of Education regulations.
When to Seek an Evaluation.
There are no hard and fast rules for
when a child should be evaluated. Here are some guidelines for
when an assessment has the strong possibility of uncovering a
true problem and leading to needed remedial help.
For Four and Five Year Olds, if the
child:
- is distinctly delayed in speech and
language compared to peers
- can't write his/her first name by the
middle of the kindergarten year
- can't identify or write most of the
letters of the alphabet correctly by late in the kindergarten
year.
In Middle to Late First Grade, if the
child:
- can't reliably read or spell very common
words such as "the" and "with"
- can't routinely say the sounds associated
with "m," "k," "ch," or "sl"
- struggles with basic arithmetic such
as knowing the answer to 6 minus 3 or 5 plus 6.
For Older Children, if the child:
- functions in a skill like children
three quarters of his/her age or younger
- is getting Ds and Fs yet is distinctly
trying
- takes nearly double or more time to
complete homework compared to peers.
At any age, an evaluation is warranted
if a child puts forth a good,
sustained effort in a basic academic skill, but remains highly
frustrated in either learning or using that skill. Excessive
frustration is a red flag that something is wrong.
----------------------
Dr. Zieman is an Albuquerque psychologist
who specializes in the evaluation of child and adolescent disorders.
He also works with people having ADHD.
----------------------
Learning Disability Articles
Part 1 | Part 3
| Part 4
----------------------
Return to List of Titles
Return to Dr.Zieman's Home Page
Copyright by Parenting New Mexico and Gayle L Zieman PhD.
This article may not be published in part or in its entirety
in any medium without written permission from Gayle L Zieman PhD
or Parenting New Mexico magazine.
Links to this page are welcome.
|